DUI Circumstantial Evidence

The Weight of Circumstantial Evidence in DUI Cases

In a court of law, the evidence presented would lead a jury to prove beyond a reasonable doubt of the commission of the crime. In DUI cases, evidence presented are of two kinds. Understanding the weight of the kinds of evidence is important in reaching judgments in DUI cases.

The first kind of evidence in DUI cases is called direct evidence. This kind of evidence is facts which can be observed directly by the human senses. These are the facts that can be seen, heard, smelled, tasted, touched and felt. An example of this is the observance of thunder and lightning in an overcast sky. An individual can see the overcast clouds, the streak of lightning, the momentary brightness and the loud booming of thunder. These facts would be evidence that thunder and lightning occurred at a particular time.

The second kind of evidence presented in DUI cases is called circumstantial evidence. This kind of evidence are those facts would help individuals be lead to inferences when appreciating them for evidentiary purposes. An example would be, using the thunder and lightning example previously done, would be the reports of other individuals observing the thunder and lightning that occurred, a power outage (due to the lightning strike) or puddles of water on the sidewalk afterwards. All these facts taken together would lead an individual to infer the occurrence of a thunder and lightning storm.

In the case of DUI felony trials, most of the evidence presented for appreciation is entirely circumstantial in nature. These include traffic violations observed by a police officers, the report on the breathalyzer and chemical tests conducted, the observations of the police officer during the arrest and others that were seen at the scene of the crime can lead individuals to the inference or presumption that a violation of the state’s DUI laws was committed.

The chemical tests conducted, using blood and urine are also circumstantial evidence. This would only prove that the individual’s state at the time of testing, not at the time of driving. This makes the time difference between the time of driving and time of testing critical to the viability of this kind of circumstantial evidence. What these tests seek to infer is the actual state of intoxication or influence at the time of driving of the individual.

In jury trials for DUI, the appreciation of circumstantial evidence is important. In the State of California, the jury is instructed that if two reasonable inferences can be reached from the evidence presented, with one leading to guilt while the other leading to innocence, then jury is instructed to accept only the evidence that leads to innocence. This is in consonance with the presumption of innocence that the Constitution upholds for every accused individual undergoing trial.

In order to be properly advised and guided on the steps towards facing this kind of legal problem, then call the DUI Attorneys of the Law Offices of Ramiro J. Lluis for a free consultation today.

Contact us

Toll Free 1(213) 687-4412

Contact us now for Free Consultation

DUI Circumstantial Evidence

20 Responses

  1. Listen to the jurors’ cmnoemts, Karen, and you’ll agree with the above post. Never commit a crime, or be accused of one, in Morgan County.As for the jurors’ minds, the word “closed” pops up.But, as AI knows, that alone is not grounds for appeal. This guy may well have done it. For the sake of justice, I sure hope he did. Jill’s family needs the relief that a guilty verdict should bring.But don’t for a minute think it was justice.

    Elton September 26, 2015 at 6:08 am #
  2. I like to party, not look articles up online. You made it happen.

    insurance car September 27, 2015 at 5:43 am #
  3. Wow! Great to find a post with such a clear message!

    auto insurance quote September 27, 2015 at 7:47 am #
  4. This is just the perfect answer for all of us

    car insurance September 27, 2015 at 9:20 am #
  5. It’s a relief to find someone who can explain things so well

    cheap car insurance September 27, 2015 at 4:53 pm #
  6. Just what the doctor ordered, thankity you!

    car insurance September 27, 2015 at 5:33 pm #
  7. That’s a shrewd answer to a tricky question

    car insurance quotes September 28, 2015 at 1:48 am #
  8. There’s a secret about your post. ICTYBTIHTKY

    online car insurance September 28, 2015 at 6:08 am #
  9. This site is like a classroom, except I don’t hate it. lol

    auto insurance quotes September 28, 2015 at 10:37 am #
  10. Finding this post has solved my problem

    car insurance quotes September 28, 2015 at 5:55 pm #
  11. AKAIK you’ve got the answer in one!

    auto insurance quotes September 28, 2015 at 6:17 pm #
  12. I’ve been looking for a post like this for an age

    car insurance quotes September 28, 2015 at 9:02 pm #
  13. I’m grateful you made the post. It’s cleared the air for me.

    car insurance September 29, 2015 at 12:48 am #
  14. Absolutely first rate and copper-bottomed, gentlemen!

    auto insurance quotes September 29, 2015 at 1:17 am #
  15. Whoa, things just got a whole lot easier.

    car insurance quotes September 29, 2015 at 2:26 am #
  16. A piece of erudition unlike any other!

    auto insurance September 29, 2015 at 4:40 am #
  17. This makes everything so completely painless.

    insurance quotes auto September 29, 2015 at 6:28 am #
  18. Knowledge wants to be free, just like these articles!

    car insurance September 29, 2015 at 12:40 pm #
  19. If time is money you’ve made me a wealthier woman.

    car insurance quotes September 29, 2015 at 2:43 pm #
  20. Many many quality points there.

    car insurance quotes September 29, 2015 at 4:08 pm #

Leave a Reply